CertiPro CISSP: DRAFT Domain 1 Quesitons 2023 (Intermediate)

Description

***That is course is within the draft model. Please give us couple of extra days to finalize the questions.***

This observe query set was developed for learners who wish to be sure that they absolutely perceive Domain 1 as a part of the broader CISSP preparation course of.

The questions are separate from our greatest in school CertiPro CISSP: Follow CISSP Examination 2023 (Intermediate) and are supposed to improve understanding of Domain particularly.

This CISSP observe take a look at query set focuses completely on Domain 1: Safety and Threat Administration, which is a necessary facet of the Licensed Info Techniques Safety Skilled (CISSP) examination. Domain 1 covers vital subjects resembling confidentiality, integrity, and availability, danger evaluation, danger administration, and organizational safety insurance policies and procedures.

Our fastidiously crafted questions will problem your understanding of key ideas and rules inside Domain 1, together with:

1. Info safety rules and ideas, together with the CIA triad, safety governance, and safety administration.

2. Threat administration processes and methodologies, together with danger evaluation, danger mitigation, and danger monitoring.

3. Authorized, regulatory, and compliance necessities associated to data safety, together with information safety legal guidelines, business requirements, and compliance frameworks.

4. Safety insurance policies, procedures, and tips that kind the muse of a corporation’s safety program, together with their growth, implementation, and enforcement.

5. Enterprise continuity and catastrophe restoration planning, which make sure the group’s resilience within the face of safety incidents and disasters.

6. Personnel safety and safety consciousness coaching, which emphasize the significance of human components in data safety.

By training with this Domain 1-specific query set, you’ll achieve a deeper understanding of the fabric and enhance your capability to use your information in real-world eventualities. Whether or not you’re getting ready for the CISSP examination or trying to improve your understanding of safety and danger administration rules, this observe take a look at will present helpful insights and enable you to construct the mandatory confidence to succeed.

Beneath are some pattern Q&A:

Questions:

1. Rashid, a safety marketing consultant, is reviewing the danger administration processes of a corporation. He discovers that the group primarily depends on qualitative danger evaluation strategies. Which of the next eventualities could be a major concern for Rashid when utilizing qualitative danger evaluation strategies?

a. Evaluating dangers throughout totally different departments

b. Assigning a financial worth to recognized dangers

c. Figuring out the basis trigger of every danger

d. Speaking the danger data to stakeholders

2. Maria, the CISO of a multinational company, is updating the corporate’s data safety insurance policies. She desires to make sure that the insurance policies are aligned with worldwide finest practices. Which of the next frameworks could be probably the most acceptable for Maria to observe when updating the safety insurance policies?

a. NIST Cybersecurity Framework

b. ISO/IEC 27001

c. COBIT 5

d. PCI DSS

3. Yusuf is a safety analyst accountable for conducting a Enterprise Influence Evaluation (BIA) for his group. Which of the next components could be probably the most essential for Yusuf to think about when evaluating the potential affect of a disruption to vital enterprise processes?

a. Price of the disruption

b. Period of the disruption

c. Most tolerable downtime

d. Useful resource necessities for restoration

4. Throughout a safety audit, Natasha discovers that a corporation’s incident response plan lacks clear procedures for dealing with information breaches. Because of this, delicate information could also be vulnerable to unauthorized entry or disclosure. Which of the next could be probably the most acceptable step for Natasha to take subsequent?

a. Implement a knowledge classification coverage

b. Suggest the adoption of a knowledge loss prevention (DLP) resolution

c. Replace the incident response plan to incorporate particular information breach procedures

d. Conduct common safety consciousness coaching for workers

5. Wei is accountable for implementing an entry management mannequin that enables for centralized and versatile administration of entry management insurance policies and enforces them persistently throughout all methods. Which of the next entry management fashions ought to Wei implement?

a. Function-Based mostly Entry Management (RBAC)

b. Obligatory Entry Management (MAC)

c. Attribute-Based mostly Entry Management (ABAC)

d. Discretionary Entry Management (DAC)

6. Gabriela is growing a safety consciousness program for her group. Which of the next subjects ought to she prioritize within the coaching curriculum to cut back the chance of social engineering assaults?

a. Safe coding practices

b. Community segmentation

c. Recognizing phishing emails

d. Knowledge backup procedures

7. Amir, a safety analyst, is engaged on a challenge to implement two-factor authentication for a corporation’s distant entry system. Which of the next mixtures would offer the strongest type of two-factor authentication?

a. Password and safety questions

b. Password and biometrics

c. Biometrics and safety token

d. Safety token and sensible card

8. Throughout a danger evaluation, Olga identifies a number of dangers with a excessive chance of incidence and vital affect on the group. The dangers contain unpatched Servers. On this scenario, which of the next danger remedy methods could be probably the most acceptable for Olga to advocate to cut back the extent of danger?

a. Threat acceptance

b. Threat avoidance

c. Threat mitigation

d. Threat switch

9. Carlos is reviewing the logs of a current safety incident and discovers that an attacker exploited a zero-day vulnerability within the group’s internet software. Which of the next could be the best approach for Carlos to forestall future exploitation of comparable vulnerabilities?

a. Commonly patch and replace software program

b. Implement an internet software firewall (WAF)

c. Conduct common penetration testing

d. Implement robust password insurance policies

10. Priya is accountable for securing her group’s cellular gadgets. To make sure the gadgets are shielded from unauthorized entry and information leakage, which of the next could be the best resolution for Priya to implement?

a. Community Entry Management (NAC)

b. Intrusion Detection System (IDS)

c. Cell Machine Administration (MDM)

d. Knowledge Loss Prevention (DLP)

Solutions:

1. Appropriate reply: a. Evaluating dangers throughout totally different departments

Rationalization: Qualitative danger evaluation strategies depend on subjective evaluation and use descriptive phrases, resembling low, medium, or excessive, to guage dangers. This strategy could make it tough to match dangers throughout totally different departments or enterprise models persistently, because the subjective nature could lead to various interpretations. Quantitative danger evaluation strategies, which use numerical values, are higher fitted to such comparisons.

Incorrect reply choices: b. Assigning a financial worth to recognized dangers – Quantitative danger evaluation strategies are used for this objective. c. Figuring out the basis trigger of every danger – Each qualitative and quantitative strategies can be utilized to determine root causes. d. Speaking the danger data to stakeholders – Each qualitative and quantitative strategies can be utilized to speak danger data.

2. Appropriate reply: b. ISO/IEC 27001

Rationalization: ISO/IEC 27001 is a world customary for data safety administration methods (ISMS) that gives a complete framework for establishing, implementing, and sustaining safety insurance policies, procedures, and controls inside a corporation. Aligning the corporate’s safety insurance policies with this customary will make sure that they adhere to worldwide finest practices.

Incorrect reply choices: a. NIST Cybersecurity Framework – Whereas this framework affords a construction for managing cybersecurity danger, it’s not as complete as ISO/IEC 27001 for creating safety insurance policies. c. COBIT 5 – COBIT 5 focuses on IT governance and administration, not particularly on creating safety insurance policies. d. PCI DSS – The Cost Card Business Knowledge Safety Customary (PCI DSS) particularly addresses the safety of cardholder information and isn’t a complete framework for total safety coverage growth.

3. Appropriate reply: c. Most tolerable downtime

Rationalization: The utmost tolerable downtime (MTD) is the utmost period of time that a corporation can tolerate a disruption to a vital enterprise course of earlier than it causes unacceptable harm or losses. When evaluating the potential affect of a disruption, it’s important to think about the MTD, as it’s going to assist decide the required restoration time aims (RTOs) and restoration level aims (RPOs) for enterprise continuity and catastrophe restoration planning.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Price of the disruption – Whereas vital, price is just one facet of evaluating the potential affect of a disruption. b. Period of the disruption – MTD is extra essential than the disruption’s length, because it signifies the utmost time a enterprise can face up to the disruption. d. Useful resource necessities for restoration – Useful resource necessities are vital for restoration planning however will not be probably the most essential issue when evaluating the potential affect of a disruption.

4. Appropriate reply: c. Replace the incident response plan to incorporate particular information breach procedures

Rationalization: An incident response plan ought to embrace clear procedures for dealing with several types of safety incidents, together with information breaches. By updating the plan to incorporate particular information breach procedures, Natasha can make sure that the group is healthier ready to reply to and handle such incidents, decreasing the danger of unauthorized entry or disclosure of delicate information.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Implement a knowledge classification coverage – Whereas vital for total information safety, it doesn’t immediately deal with the dearth of information breach procedures within the incident response plan. b. Suggest the adoption of a knowledge loss prevention (DLP) resolution – Though DLP may also help forestall information breaches, it doesn’t deal with the dearth of information breach procedures within the incident response plan. d. Conduct common safety consciousness coaching for workers – Whereas it is a essential element of a safety program, it doesn’t immediately deal with the dearth of information breach procedures within the incident response plan.

5. Appropriate reply: c. Attribute-Based mostly Entry Management (ABAC)

Rationalization: Attribute-Based mostly Entry Management (ABAC) is an entry management mannequin that enables for centralized administration of entry management insurance policies and enforces them persistently throughout all methods. It makes use of attributes, resembling consumer roles, useful resource attributes, and environmental components, to find out entry permissions. This mannequin supplies a extra granular and versatile strategy to managing entry management in comparison with different fashions.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Function-Based mostly Entry Management (RBAC) – Whereas RBAC centralizes administration of entry management, it’s not as versatile or granular as ABAC because it depends solely on consumer roles. b. Obligatory Entry Management (MAC) – MAC enforces entry management based mostly on classification ranges and isn’t designed for centralized administration and enforcement throughout all methods. d. Discretionary Entry Management (DAC) – DAC permits customers to grant or limit entry to sources at their discretion, which isn’t appropriate for centralized administration of entry management insurance policies.

6. Appropriate reply: c. Recognizing phishing emails

Rationalization: Social engineering assaults, resembling phishing, usually depend on deception and manipulation to trick customers into revealing delicate data or granting unauthorized entry. To cut back the chance of profitable social engineering assaults, it’s essential to prioritize coaching workers on acknowledge phishing emails and keep away from falling sufferer to them.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Safe coding practices – This matter is extra related for builders and isn’t immediately associated to social engineering assaults. b. Community segmentation – Whereas vital for total safety, community segmentation doesn’t deal with social engineering assaults. d. Knowledge backup procedures – Whereas information backups are vital for catastrophe restoration, they don’t immediately deal with social engineering assaults.

7. Appropriate reply: c. Biometrics and safety token

Rationalization: Two-factor authentication (2FA) depends on the usage of two various factors or classes of authentication strategies. The three major classes are one thing (e.g., passwords), one thing you will have (e.g., safety tokens), and one thing you’re (e.g., biometrics). Combining biometrics (one thing you’re) with a safety token (one thing you will have) supplies the strongest type of two-factor authentication, because it requires attackers to beat two distinct limitations.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Password and safety questions – Each are “one thing ” components and don’t present true two-factor authentication. b. Password and biometrics – Whereas this mixture supplies robust 2FA, biometrics and safety token are thought of stronger as a result of have to possess a bodily system (safety token) together with a singular organic attribute (biometrics). d. Safety token and sensible card – Each are “one thing you will have” components and don’t present true two-factor authentication.

8. Appropriate reply: c. Threat mitigation

Rationalization: When dealing with dangers with a excessive chance of incidence and vital affect on the group, danger mitigation is probably the most acceptable remedy technique. Threat mitigation includes implementing controls and measures to cut back the chance or affect of the danger to an appropriate degree. This strategy helps reduce the potential unfavourable penalties of the recognized dangers.

Incorrect reply choices: a. Threat acceptance – This technique isn’t acceptable for high-likelihood and high-impact dangers, because it includes accepting the danger with out taking any motion to handle it. b. Threat avoidance – Threat avoidance includes fully eliminating the danger by not partaking within the exercise that generates it. This strategy is usually not sensible or possible for a lot of dangers. d. Threat switch – Whereas transferring danger to a 3rd celebration (e.g., by insurance coverage) could be a legitimate technique, it doesn’t actively scale back the chance or affect of the danger itself.

9. Appropriate reply: b. Implement an internet software firewall (WAF)

Rationalization: An internet software firewall (WAF) is particularly designed to guard internet purposes from numerous forms of assaults, together with zero-day vulnerabilities. By implementing a WAF, Carlos can create customized guidelines and use digital patching to forestall t

If the coupon isn’t opening, disable Adblock, or strive one other browser.